<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Case Studies on CodeInstances.com</title>
    <link>https://codeinstances.com/tags/case-studies/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Case Studies on CodeInstances.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://codeinstances.com/tags/case-studies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How a Bug Report Can Arrive as a Runnable CodeInstances File</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-a-bug-report-can-arrive-as-a-runnable-codeinstances-file/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-a-bug-report-can-arrive-as-a-runnable-codeinstances-file/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You maintain a command-line tool that talks to an online service. An issue comes in: &amp;ldquo;sync breaks against our account&amp;rdquo;. You don&amp;rsquo;t have their account. You can&amp;rsquo;t see their data. You ask for logs, then a bigger log, then a screen share, and after a week of back and forth you still haven&amp;rsquo;t seen the failure happen.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reporter could send the failure itself. If they run your tool under CodeInstances, the run is kept as a file with every request your tool made and every answer their account gave back:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How CodeInstances Keeps the Failing Run of a Flaky CI Test</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-codeinstances-keeps-the-failing-run-of-a-flaky-ci-test/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-codeinstances-keeps-the-failing-run-of-a-flaky-ci-test/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s a situation most teams know. An integration test fails about one run in twenty. It calls an API that usually answers one way and occasionally answers another (a field missing, a list in a different order, a slow page that times out). Somebody hits rerun, it goes green, and the failure is gone. A week later it happens again, and the ticket still says &amp;ldquo;can&amp;rsquo;t reproduce&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The trouble is that the one run worth looking at is the one nobody kept. Logs say the test failed. They don&amp;rsquo;t hold the answer that made it fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Develop Against a Metered or Rate Limited API With CodeInstances</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-develop-against-a-metered-or-rate-limited-api-with-codeinstances/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-develop-against-a-metered-or-rate-limited-api-with-codeinstances/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some APIs you can&amp;rsquo;t call as often as you&amp;rsquo;d like. A payments sandbox that throttles you after a burst. A maps or weather API billed per request. A partner&amp;rsquo;s staging server that falls over every afternoon. You&amp;rsquo;re working on the part of your program that handles the answers (the formatting, the error messages, the retry logic), and each try means another call you&amp;rsquo;d rather not make.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Record the program once against the real API, and work against the recording for the rest of the day:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Replay the AI Agent Run That Did Something Odd Last Night</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-replay-the-ai-agent-run-that-did-something-odd-last-night/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-replay-the-ai-agent-run-that-did-something-odd-last-night/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An agent ran overnight on a batch of tasks. In the morning one result is wrong. It filed a ticket under the wrong customer, or summarised a document it never fetched, or called a tool twice. You run the agent on the same task to see what happened, and it does the job perfectly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s normal for agents. The model&amp;rsquo;s answers vary from run to run, so the agent picks different tools in a different order and ends up somewhere else. Running it again doesn&amp;rsquo;t show you last night&amp;rsquo;s run. It shows you a new one. With an ordinary program, rerunning is how you debug. With an agent, the only copy of the run that went wrong is whatever you kept at the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Upgrade a Dependency With CodeInstances Replaying Real Runs</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-upgrade-a-dependency-with-codeinstances-replaying-real-runs/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-to-upgrade-a-dependency-with-codeinstances-replaying-real-runs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You need to bump something underneath your program. A new major version of the HTTP client library, a vendor&amp;rsquo;s SDK, or the Go toolchain itself. The changelog is long. Your unit tests pass, but they use mocks written two years ago against the old behaviour, so passing doesn&amp;rsquo;t tell you much. What you&amp;rsquo;d like to know is simple: does the program still do the same thing on real work?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Real runs answer that. Before the upgrade, record a handful of runs of the current build doing real work, against the real services:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
